Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Margaret Anna Alice's avatar

Thanks to everyone who understood the spirit in which this letter was written. I’m still working through the comments but must get some long-overdue sleep so would just like to share this Ralph Waldo Emerson quote to help inspire the civility I was hoping to encourage:

β€œBe silly. Be honest. Be kind.”

As I wrote in β€œRites of the Tear-Downers” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/rites-of-the-tear-downers):

β€œLet’s be the community we want to see in the world.”

Expand full comment
Lawrence Mazzuckelli's avatar

My perspective is different than most. It is a view from 30 years inside the US Public Health Service, CDC, NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) where I wrote policy to support OSHA rule making for new or improved workplace safety and health standards e.g. determining limits for occupational exposure to chemicals and conditions in which workers can safely work with biologicals. The reason that is important is because I know the laws and the conditions placed on the federal government when it imposes administrative rules on the rest of us and I'm a damn good analyst.

Here's the Cliff Notes version of roughly a year's worth of articles on Larry's Letters (https://lawrencemazzuckelli.substack.com)

1. It was no coincidence that the WIV was conveniently 1 mile from the Wuhan wet market and it left no doubt in my mind where SARS-CoV-2 originated; accident or intent were the same to me. When was the last "accidental" release from a P4 lab?

2.) CDC's narrative NEVER matched their own data. NEVER. And it still doesn't.

3.) VAERS worked and was ignored as was the work of Robert Lazarus, Harvard, CDC Contractor who tried to alert CDC that (a) VAERS was grossly under-reported (perhaps as by a factor of 100) and (b) he had a fix for it. And Jessica Rose who independently and by another method arrived at the same general conclusion albeit at a lower but also substantial under-reporting factor of 30.

4) Rochel Walensky , former CDC Director broke the law twice in order to push the narrative that COVID was worse than it really was by (a) changing the case definition of COVID-19 and (b) redefining COVID-19 mortality.

5) The notion that a novel "vaccine" based on mRNA was necessary to treat a typical viral epidemic was more than odd. (pandemic is useless jargon - all influenza's are pandemics. It's just the way it is.)

And frankly the question of why a mRNA inoculant was going to be better than the standard garden variety antibody preparation of vaccines has never been answered by anyone. Not even Dr. Malone.

6) The fact that CDC had to change the definition of "vaccine" in order to convince people to be inoculated with what they knew was hazardous (see 3 above) made it a treatment and thus illegal to push vaccine on the American public. but everyone ignored that because the fear mongering was so intense.

7) President Trump was right --- Hydroxychloroquine was an effective treatment and easily obtained data on Ivermectin also proved its complete efficacy. In short the federal government pushed its own dangerous treatments over treatments that actually worked and ensured that those effective treatments remained unavailable should frighten everyone.

8) The notion that a surgical mask has any effectiveness at stopping virus is absurd on it face and it ignores every bit of data in the possession of CDC concerning respiratory protective devices.

I for one am grateful and never disparaging of voices with inside knowledge of what happened and is STILL happening to push this poison on an ill informed and under educated American public that relies on its public health institutions and its policy makers at the highest levels of government.

I would hope that all of us who have been in this fight would be grateful for any credible ally.

Expand full comment
526 more comments...

No posts