A Plea for Civility
Thanks to everyone who understood the spirit in which this letter was written. I’m still working through the comments but must get some long-overdue sleep so would just like to share this Ralph Waldo Emerson quote to help inspire the civility I was hoping to encourage:
“Be silly. Be honest. Be kind.”
As I wrote in “Rites of the Tear-Downers” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/rites-of-the-tear-downers):
“Let’s be the community we want to see in the world.”
My perspective is different than most. It is a view from 30 years inside the US Public Health Service, CDC, NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) where I wrote policy to support OSHA rule making for new or improved workplace safety and health standards e.g. determining limits for occupational exposure to chemicals and conditions in which workers can safely work with biologicals. The reason that is important is because I know the laws and the conditions placed on the federal government when it imposes administrative rules on the rest of us and I'm a damn good analyst.
Here's the Cliff Notes version of roughly a year's worth of articles on Larry's Letters (https://lawrencemazzuckelli.substack.com)
1. It was no coincidence that the WIV was conveniently 1 mile from the Wuhan wet market and it left no doubt in my mind where SARS-CoV-2 originated; accident or intent were the same to me. When was the last "accidental" release from a P4 lab?
2.) CDC's narrative NEVER matched their own data. NEVER. And it still doesn't.
3.) VAERS worked and was ignored as was the work of Robert Lazarus, Harvard, CDC Contractor who tried to alert CDC that (a) VAERS was grossly under-reported (perhaps as by a factor of 100) and (b) he had a fix for it. And Jessica Rose who independently and by another method arrived at the same general conclusion albeit at a lower but also substantial under-reporting factor of 30.
4) Rochel Walensky , former CDC Director broke the law twice in order to push the narrative that COVID was worse than it really was by (a) changing the case definition of COVID-19 and (b) redefining COVID-19 mortality.
5) The notion that a novel "vaccine" based on mRNA was necessary to treat a typical viral epidemic was more than odd. (pandemic is useless jargon - all influenza's are pandemics. It's just the way it is.)
And frankly the question of why a mRNA inoculant was going to be better than the standard garden variety antibody preparation of vaccines has never been answered by anyone. Not even Dr. Malone.
6) The fact that CDC had to change the definition of "vaccine" in order to convince people to be inoculated with what they knew was hazardous (see 3 above) made it a treatment and thus illegal to push vaccine on the American public. but everyone ignored that because the fear mongering was so intense.
7) President Trump was right --- Hydroxychloroquine was an effective treatment and easily obtained data on Ivermectin also proved its complete efficacy. In short the federal government pushed its own dangerous treatments over treatments that actually worked and ensured that those effective treatments remained unavailable should frighten everyone.
8) The notion that a surgical mask has any effectiveness at stopping virus is absurd on it face and it ignores every bit of data in the possession of CDC concerning respiratory protective devices.
I for one am grateful and never disparaging of voices with inside knowledge of what happened and is STILL happening to push this poison on an ill informed and under educated American public that relies on its public health institutions and its policy makers at the highest levels of government.
I would hope that all of us who have been in this fight would be grateful for any credible ally.
The tip-off was when Malone decided to sue the Breggins for $25 million.
The vaccines were made to Kill, Injure and maim (add sterilize), proof it was on purpose, is that the question? Well, by now we all should be able to grab some evidence off shelf, my fav is when Pfizer wanted 75 years to release the trial data. Oh, oh, and during the Brooke VS Pfizer trail, Pfizer said, "We did not commit fraud, we delivered the fraud the US Government asked for."
What the hell is Malone talking about? Pfft. Hey Malone, prove to us that it is not a bio-weapon. Good luck to you.
Oh forgot your "Money Shot"
Prove it is not a bio-weapon or Shut the Fu Up
It's simple- Dr. Mike Yeadon is the real deal, an intelligent pharma insider, expert on viruses, upper respiratory infections, opiates' effects in the above patients, and a top notch drug development expert.
He saw what was painful to see, early on, that this had to be intentional.
There is no other possible explanation if you rationally examine the facts.
Every single thing the government did was destructive to human health, our fighting the virus, our freedom of speech, or property rights, and they frankly isolated and killed Grandma in hospital after practicing weapons grade psychology operations on the entire general public, lying all the while about early treatment, destroyed those who saved life, and finally rolled out a killer quack zine after a year of softening up the "marks."
Yeadon saw it early. Called it early. Told the truth despite the horror.
And this AGENDA was planned, and executed, WORLDWIDE.
It's bloody obvious.
Malone is showing his true colors once again by attacking the finest, most honest among us, just as he did with Ginger & Peter Breggins to "chill" anyone daring to question him.
Hmmm. What are his receipts? Where does his expertise come from?
Why does my only child, a girl have bio-weapons installed in her body now, with Robert Malone's deadly dangerous tech?
Pick your favorite horse. I'll bet on Yeadon, any time!
PS- between Sasha Latypova, Katherine Watts, ICENI, Sage Hana and others, ALL the receipts are on SUBSTACK!
Don’t forget, that Dr. Malone actually took the jab himself and was injured by it. That’s when his awakening began. Clearly, Dr. Yeadon has been awakened for much longer time than Dr. Malone. It is very disappointing to see Dr. Malone behaving in such a way towards someone to whom he should be very respectful. Your article is excellent as usual.
I’m with you on this. His vitriol towards Mike is very unsettling as a long-time supporter of Robert Malone. Hmmm..
Thank you for your strong defense of Mike Yeadon. He was one of the first voices of truth and reason I was blessed to discover fairly early in the covid debacle. As a layperson, I can only say I strongly sensed I could trust him.
The same spiritual discernment that told me there was something satanic about the whole "pandemic" scenario also told me there was something angelic about Mike Yeadon. He is doing God's work, exposing lies and revealing truth. He is a true hero.
I enjoy your post..but I personally think that Malone is not who you purport him to be. I have mistrusted him almost from his first appearance on the scene. He is connected to a lot of very questionable characters. He along with many others are not to be trusted nor believed
Sometimes behavior is a good indicator of intent. People reveal themselves by how they treat others.
thank you for this
I have been questioning Malone for a while.....his response to Yeadon did not help convince me to remain in his camp. Thank you for this article - excellent, once again and very much needed and called for. After all the fallout the truth will be known and it will weed out those who fall short.
From the moment I was introduced to Malone on Dark Horse, I was fascinated by his personality and I knew there was a problem. No fucking way he would have taken the jab knowing what he knows.
When you tell so many truths, half-truths and outright lies, it becomes difficult to keep track of what you have said in the past. You will eventually trip on your own words.
Mike Yeadon needn’t worry about that as far as I can tell. He lives by a simple, repeatable credo. Don’t lie or obfuscate.
Thank you for writing and sharing this exceptionally well crafted response with us. You've composed a note to Dr Malone that is far more patient and compassionate than I would be capable of. The venom with which he has attacked respected members of the medical freedom movement is, I guess you could say, a deal breaker for me. It just doesn't add up and even my most optimistic interpretations of his hostility leave me with a very bad taste in my mouth. Mistakes were not made. Thank you again. Please keep us posted to any response you receive.
Thanks for your integrity, courage and attempts to foster reconciliation we need so badly. I was not aware of this issue between Malone an Yeadon, but was similarly inclined to mediate between him and the Breggins. We have such a daunting challenge before us and I share your distress about these personal conflicts that interfere with what we must achieve. Thanks for including some links to my work and using "Verido." I hope Malone responds positively.
To pile on to your already impressive pile of evidence:
Take a look at what the "experts" were saying in February 2020 -- before a single school was closed:
Nonetheless, a degree of clarity is emerging from this report. The median age of the patients was 59 years, with higher morbidity and mortality among the elderly and among those with coexisting conditions (similar to the situation with influenza); 56% of the patients were male. Of note, there were no cases in children younger than 15 years of age. Either children are less likely to become infected, which would have important epidemiologic implications, or their symptoms were so mild that their infection escaped detection, which has implications for the size of the denominator of total community infections.