165 Comments

We’re screwed as a country if this moves forward. Really. The tyranny will NEVER end. I’m so sick of this.

Your points were excellent, btw!! I concur 100%.

Expand full comment

True, Butterfly2510, and glad you appreciated it!

Expand full comment

As the world, not just as a country - this is a global treaty. Global treaties are a bad idea.

Expand full comment

To me, it's not the treaties or laws that are bad ideas. It's the uneven playing field that is skewed by the interest of wealthy and powerful that seem to inevitably drive the treaties and laws towards the interest of "the elite" few as appose to the majority. Also, when these very "elite" breaks any of these treaties there is no consequence while if any member outside of the club does the same they are willing to severely punish them, and damn the collateral damage, and insist on bring on even more draconian measures that benefit the same "elite".

Expand full comment

Well-put, browntsunami!

Expand full comment

Well said!

Expand full comment

Margaret Anna is a prophetess. The type of genius that occurs in 50 year cycles. A clarion call. She must be silenced at all cost, lest the stuporous awaken.

Expand full comment

Thanks Margaret Anna Alice for that rigorous and concise summary of reasonable objectives for updates to health policies in each country. I don't believe that a world governing body on health can be successful or productive, only intrusive and unproductive leading to the types of social upheavals as we are continuing to witness.

Expand full comment

Thank you, Tom, and I agree!

Expand full comment

And corruption

Expand full comment

Excellent, Margaret.

The WHO does not even provide a receipt of the comments or even an acknowledgment!

My comment was general, along the lines of:

1. It is my body, my choice; quoting the Australian PM

2. Health is a personal matter between an individual and his/her doctor

3. Who care more for me - me or another organisation or temporal being? Me! Therefore I must have the first and final say.

4. Why would govts need to force people, directly and via proxy, to take something if they can prove it is safe, effective, and necessary???

Expand full comment

Great job and thanks, Barry!

Expand full comment

I repeatedly challenge people with this: You think they were selling Iife jackets on the Titanic this hard?

Expand full comment

Great tact, FedUpInOR! 😆

Expand full comment

NOICE!

Expand full comment

You cant even ring the WHO, its a fortress! Try it

Expand full comment

Abolish the WHO and start over, this time WITHOUT conflicts of interest in the funding mechanism, and specify up front in that organization's charter that they are an ADVISORY organization only. No Decisions by Unelected Bureaucrats. (Are you reading this, U. S. congress?)

Ratified or not, this 'treaty' won't be worth the paper it's written on.

Expand full comment

Amen! As I mentioned elsewhere in this thread, my forthcoming letter to the WHO member states calls for its abolition and replacement with the World Council for Health (https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/).

Expand full comment

Agree wholeheartedly. The world desperately needs a private sector alternative to the governmental madness. Here's hoping that the WCH conference will ignite it.

Expand full comment

🙌🔥

Expand full comment

I sent this yesterday Margaret Anna:

Substantive Elements in a new international instrument for pandemic preparedness and response should include:

-- no legal obligations by any city or county or their police / militia to enforce WHO laws, rules, or dictates that include any of the following: 1) shutting down any business for any reason, 2) NO forcing of any human to submit to drugs, treatments, or any substance that interacts with the body, 3) No forcing any human to wear any mask or body covering not proven with high statistical proof(95% Confidence and N >= 10000) to be effective at reducing community risk, 4) No experimental vaccines, gene therapy, or medical treatments of any kind shall be allowed on any human for any reason

-- Complete transparency to all WHO documents, access to all WHO scientists by any human who asks within 24 hours with no redaction of any kind on any document under pain of jail by all preventing such transparency and access.

-- Full proof of existence and full isolation of any and all pathogens claimed by any agency inside or outside the USA using Koch's rules.

-- Full electron microscope image proof of viral or pathogen existence with a jury of observers in attendance

-- Full Proof of pathogenecity.

-- Local and county authorities will have higher jurisdiction and power than any Federal or outside US organization including the WHO and CDC and NIH to choose to enforce external rules or dictates of any kind or communicate with citizens regarding such.

-- No action shall be allowed on the part of any body, group, or agency outside the USA to implement physical effects on citizens of the USA directly or indirectly.

-- LEGAL, informed consent in all cases of offering any medical treatment.

Expand full comment

Excellent, pretty-red, old guy!

Expand full comment

I don't like your number 3 very much. The WHO isn't permitted to force this human here to wear any fucking thing on my face no matter how effective or ineffective it is.

Though they're welcome to try.

Expand full comment

I’d love to see that smackdown if they did try! 🙅‍♀️🥋😆

Expand full comment

No. You wouldn't.

No one would want to see what I would do if I survived long enough to see it through.

I've saved a lot up.

Expand full comment

🤣

Expand full comment

It will be pretty hard, possibly impossible, to meet the statistical requirements. . .

Expand full comment

substantive Elements in a new international instrument for pandemic preparedness and response should include:

-- no legal obligations by any city or county or their police / militia to enforce WHO laws, rules, or dictates.

That’s it. No police or militia should ever be enforcing any pandemic dictates, rules, or laws. Ever. It will take away personal body autonomy completely. We’ll all be China with the government retaining the ability to put in or take from our bodies as they see fit. The WHO having police or Militia to enforce their will on society is Inhumane.

*So good they’ll force you to do it*

Expand full comment

Magnificent addition! 👏

Expand full comment

That is a terrific submission. When I was reading it to my husband he was like "YASSS!" Hope you don't mind a stole some points from your submission. I added recommending vit D, quercetin and NAC as recommendations OTC. A demand to cease vilifying ivermectin early treatment. Free flow of trial information - no suppressing information that the drug companies don't like.

Not as eloquent as MAA, but hicks be hicks. I got through their math hurdle. ; ) Not all humans can subtract and their math skills are often iffy so I thought the prove your a human question was a little funny.

Signed the petition. Hope it helps.

Expand full comment

Haha, how fun to hear your and your husband’s responses—thanks, Raptor! And I absolutely don’t mind your stealing points from my entry as that is part of the point of my sharing it :-) Great additions, too!

Expand full comment

I supposed they could have asked what the definition of a woman for their I am a human?

Expand full comment

😆

Expand full comment

This is the same WHO that would not go into Wuhan to find out the cause of the virus leak. The same WHO that employed Peter Daszak as a key investigator when they did do a 'investigation'. The same WHO that insists that hydroxychloriquine and ivermectin do not work to treat the virus. The same WHO that cosy's ups to Bill Gates CEPI and WEF? The same groups pushing vaccines and digital id's? This is a joke right ceding to this cartel of crooks? And you are right, this cannot be a fait accompli.

How can governments cede their responsibility over to an unelectable organization such as the WHO? No if they get away with it, it's a coup d'etat of sovereign states and then the digital vaccine passport will be implemented and we must not have that!

Expand full comment

This is why my forthcoming letter to the WHO member states calls for its abolition and replacement with Dr. Tess Lawrie’s World Council for Health (https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/) as they have no conflicts of interest and are committed to scientific integrity and *true* public health.

Expand full comment

Tess Lawrie with Dr Kory were talking about setting up

an alternative to WHO

Expand full comment

That's the World Council for Health I mentioned in the instructions above!

https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/

Expand full comment

Our governments have betrayed and sold us.

Expand full comment

WHO Looks to Monopolize Health Systems Worldwide • Children's Health Defense

The World Health Organization’s international pandemic treaty signals the organization may be planning to seize power over health systems and push the world toward universal health coverage.

The WHO is totally corrupt - In the aftermath of the swine flu pandemic of 2009, the vaccine for which left many thousands injured, the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly (PACE) concluded that “the handling of the pandemic by the WHO, EU health agencies and national governments led to a ‘waste of large sums of public money, and unjustified scares and fears about the health risks faced by the European public.'” In other words, across the board censorship. If the WHO is given complete authority over health, censorship will be a given and science as we know it will basically cease to exist. Originally published by Mercola.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/who-monopolize-health-systems-worldwide/

Expand full comment

Agreed and thanks, Rick!

Expand full comment

The WHO are basically owned by Bill gates. The government's are bought and paid for. We are going to end up like Shanghai:(

Expand full comment

Why is this piece of paper drafted by us plebes supposed to make any difference? Seriously. The elitists don't care about our constitution. If they bother looking at it they'll laugh and rip it up to light their cigars with.

The emergency powers will end when they want them to. AKA never. Asking these abusive sociopaths nicely please not to harm us won't work. It's like telling a battered wife to avoid beatings by cooking him a nice meal and expressing how unhappy being injured makes her. Using "positive I" statements. Because abusive sociopaths are so reasonable.

We need to find ways to nullify this locally. By this I mean figure out ways to live without obeying these unlawful bullies.

Expand full comment

I dissent.

They must know there are opposition to their scams. Otherwise they will take silence = approval.

Expand full comment

💯

Expand full comment

They control the system and are accountable to none of us. They don't give a rip about any papers we sign expressing our interests or concerns. We need to be figuring out on-the-ground grass roots survival strategies for when the WHO takes over. Or we can sit around nicely petitioning and negotiating with those bent on destroying us.

The takeover is inevitable. We must prepare to live outside the NWO system. If that is possible. More realistic than expecting the democidal technocrats to suddenly act nice and play by the rules which they make up as they go and refuse to abide by.

Expand full comment

I understand your feelings, RE, and I certainly encourage people to organize locally to protect against the oncoming train, but while we still have the semblance of civilization, I still think it sends a powerful message for the WHO to get inundated with objections to its totalitarian power grab rather than people just lying down and accepting it.

I will be calling for the abolition of the WHO in my upcoming letter to the member states.

Expand full comment

Like the Declaration of Independence?

Expand full comment

Haha, not a bad idea. Meanwhile, we can work on building our parallel society:

https://academyofideas.com/2022/02/parallel-society-vs-totalitarianism-how-to-create-a-free-world/

Expand full comment

Agree, and its the digital pasports that they are aiming to implement, this is a strategic move to put the pieces in place to coordinate it from one control centre. Effectively they want the world to operate in lockstep, as they have bern doing.

Expand full comment

🙌 Amen, brother!

Expand full comment

Submitted my comments. ALL based upon your views. Let's see what happens.

Expand full comment

Awesome and thanks so much, Antero!

Expand full comment

As per your usual, an EXCELLENT summation of the issues which need to be considered and addressed by the WHO. Thank you so much for your documentation!

Expand full comment

Thanks so much, KSSM!

Expand full comment

LETS SAY Barnhardt and this article are correct? There is no reasoning with WHO, NIH, CDC!

---------------------------------------------------------

Largest crime against humanity ever perpetrated, by a long shot. And it will never end until they are PERMANENTLY, PHYSICALLY STOPPED.

When people say repeatedly, in no uncertain terms, for decades on end, that their primary goal and agenda is to reduce the human population by 90% in a matter of years, they should be taken at their word.

https://freewestmedia.com/2022/04/02/tennis-world-shocked-after-scores-of-players-drop-out-of-miami-open/

Expand full comment

Yes, if that doesn’t send a wakeup call to the world, I don’t know what will. Of course, it’s already old news and the sleeping are still willfully asleep …

Expand full comment

Signed and submitted

Expand full comment

Stop the mandates - vote for peace!

Expand full comment

These corrupt scumbags won't give a crap but I told them what I think would work

Stop giving pharma and their captured regulators the right to declare disease when they haven't fucking isolated it or proven it's contagiousness

https://northerntracey213875959.wordpress.com/2021/05/14/contagion-fact-checked/

Expand full comment

*lol* Good for you, Robert! 👏

Expand full comment