Margaret - Shades of an earlier, although much less vitriolic conversation about Dr. Malone that you and I had a while back.
I have to agree, the Malone of 2022 is not the same as 2021. It's been interesting to watch his progression from his earlier dogmatic allopathic medical positions to where he is now.
As far as the antiquated, R…
Margaret - Shades of an earlier, although much less vitriolic conversation about Dr. Malone that you and I had a while back.
I have to agree, the Malone of 2022 is not the same as 2021. It's been interesting to watch his progression from his earlier dogmatic allopathic medical positions to where he is now.
As far as the antiquated, Rockefeller installed belief systems that still pervade modern medicine, do I feel he has reached the level of questioning that I would like to see him achieve? No. However, as I mentioned in our earlier conversation, he's in a very good position to coax along major changes in how we perceive disease... if he continues to advance.
Thank you for your thoughtful note, Kyle, and I continue to nudge him along in the areas where I think he may still have blind spots (e.g., I urged him to read “Dissolving Illusions,” which I think he will find as mind-blowing as I and everyone else who’s read it has).
Margaret - Shades of an earlier, although much less vitriolic conversation about Dr. Malone that you and I had a while back.
I have to agree, the Malone of 2022 is not the same as 2021. It's been interesting to watch his progression from his earlier dogmatic allopathic medical positions to where he is now.
As far as the antiquated, Rockefeller installed belief systems that still pervade modern medicine, do I feel he has reached the level of questioning that I would like to see him achieve? No. However, as I mentioned in our earlier conversation, he's in a very good position to coax along major changes in how we perceive disease... if he continues to advance.
Thank you for your thoughtful note, Kyle, and I continue to nudge him along in the areas where I think he may still have blind spots (e.g., I urged him to read “Dissolving Illusions,” which I think he will find as mind-blowing as I and everyone else who’s read it has).
As with many things, one's beliefs change over time as new data arrive. The process does take time. The manipulation developed as a part of 'nudge' science requires effort to understand and then see how it works on us. As time progresses we will require an educational effort to overcome those tools. Obviously nudges can be used for 'good' as in https://www.dw.com/en/nudges-how-little-tricks-influence-our-decisions/a-51170445 or to promote fear https://brownstone.org/articles/the-nudge-ethically-dubious-and-ineffective/. You wording "nudge" itself prompted my response!
Haha, good point, HardeeHo—perhaps I should have avoided the word “nudge”! 😆