Thanks Peter. It's in response to a different article of hers on whether the ancient pagan gods have returned because we've broken the Judeo-Christian covenant by worshipping Satan. I look at the covenant 'god' made with Noah, which she cites, and read past the rainbow after Noah gets drunk and wakes up giving the descendants of Shem (the Semites) his blessing and making the descendants of Canaan their slaves in perpetuity. According to that passage, the Semites are given the right to own both land and people, and this is after the whole world has been destroyed by flood, so it includes all races in that story.
One of the comments said they felt Naomi was heralding a return to 'conservative' values, which would fit with her apology, that are anti-sex and pro-family / Judeo-Christian religion. I point out that there were two forms of Judaism--the Semitic one in which God upholds empire and the zealot one that stood up to the Roman Empire and was erased by the former when Jerusalem 'fell' (was pushed--mistakes were not made). So I think we need to examine both and decide first, if we support empire and second, if we believe in a God who does.
Thank you, not many people are aware of the Orignal Talmud with the Noahide Laws vs the Babylonian Talmud. There's a reason the Book of Enoch and the other books of the Apocrypha were left out of both Judaism and Christian texts, and one must always question why is this so, especially when there are numerous references to them in the approved texts. Whenever you are told something is banned from reading or being left out for some reason or another should always question why (even if only their own mind), and seek to find out. If we've learned nothing else from the past two years, it would be to question. Looking forward to watching it.
I do have a piece out on her that Margaret was kind enough to like: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/the-devil-and-naomi-wolf.
I'll read. I'm not to familiar with Naomi. just know that she frequents CHD. ty.
Thanks Peter. It's in response to a different article of hers on whether the ancient pagan gods have returned because we've broken the Judeo-Christian covenant by worshipping Satan. I look at the covenant 'god' made with Noah, which she cites, and read past the rainbow after Noah gets drunk and wakes up giving the descendants of Shem (the Semites) his blessing and making the descendants of Canaan their slaves in perpetuity. According to that passage, the Semites are given the right to own both land and people, and this is after the whole world has been destroyed by flood, so it includes all races in that story.
One of the comments said they felt Naomi was heralding a return to 'conservative' values, which would fit with her apology, that are anti-sex and pro-family / Judeo-Christian religion. I point out that there were two forms of Judaism--the Semitic one in which God upholds empire and the zealot one that stood up to the Roman Empire and was erased by the former when Jerusalem 'fell' (was pushed--mistakes were not made). So I think we need to examine both and decide first, if we support empire and second, if we believe in a God who does.
Thank you, not many people are aware of the Orignal Talmud with the Noahide Laws vs the Babylonian Talmud. There's a reason the Book of Enoch and the other books of the Apocrypha were left out of both Judaism and Christian texts, and one must always question why is this so, especially when there are numerous references to them in the approved texts. Whenever you are told something is banned from reading or being left out for some reason or another should always question why (even if only their own mind), and seek to find out. If we've learned nothing else from the past two years, it would be to question. Looking forward to watching it.