This is the triumphant conclusion of my mind-opening and heart-healing conversation with Meredith Miller. We discuss types of thinkers; revenge versus justice; Mussolini’s fate; corporativismo; and how to defeat petty tyrants.
Thank you so much for spending your precious time reading it, Edward, as well as for sharing your meaningful response. I know it requires a major time investment, but I believe those who take the time will glean valuable, potentially life-changing insights.
why using a nom-de-plume like Edward Bernaysauce ??
For sure you know, that it is this guy who is one of the most influential theorists (or shall I call him terrorist ??) in laying the psychological foundations for the current, entirely indigestible mass-psy-ops-gravy on a world-wide scale !!!
MAA you and MM should do a book together. these dialogues are pure gold.
in the summer of 2020 tessa lena said (para) "bullies exist to keep us sharp."
connects to MM's point in the post you linked, "If we want to survive and thrive, we will need to adapt to a dying world—not by allowing the anti-life agenda to unalive us, but rather to use it as motivation to create new purpose."
Aww, thank you, nymusicdaily. As it happens, Meredith and I have been discussing turning this into an e-book. I just have to find time to typeset it! I may also make a print version, but it is always a challenge converting my heavily hyperlinked and media-rich content into print format.
Kintsugi beauty and existential empathy, what powerful concepts! Thank you for this journey into healing from trauma beyond revenge. And I love that it all starts with ending the abuser's power over you. That's so important.
I couldn't agree more MM that the pursuit of vengeance or even of justice should take a back seat to the active pursuit of one's individual transformation. After all, one can not "lend a hand" to others in any kind of activity, including reconciliation, if one's arm is broken and unhealed.
From the beginning of the COV2 debacle (jan 2020)I sought evidence to prove a case against unnamed assailants by following a forensic approach to a crime. I answered the how, when and where questions and then formulated an answer to the of "what" exactly (had happened)was happening to the worldwide order. At that juncture I thought it unnecessary to speculate regarding the identities of the perpetrators ( answering the who question) or what was their motive ( answering the why question). Many people to whom I communicated my evidence backed conclusions and who believed the "pandemic" narrative would retort with "why would ( a then anonymous) "they" do this ( meaning the alarmist culture being imposed)? Unlike my evidence gleaned from publicly accessible sources, I had no way of assigning blame or motive to actual named human beings. Beings within my sources; HHS, CDC, FDA may themselves have been directed by others. There is no way of knowing, so it was both futile and pointless to even ask "who" or "why". The crime could be described, the guilty parties are untouchable. My thesis did not require suspects. Identifying suspects would have lowered my high standards of evidence and could have thereby exploded the case. I would tell the curious who had defensively, rhetorically asked "why" that that information was unimportant as to whether you believe an ongoing crime is being committed. That if you find a dead body with a bullet wound originating in the back of the head then, more likely than not a crime has been committed. At that moment of discovery one does not need a perpetrator to secure the knowledge of a crime having been committed.
Back to the point, knowledge is one pathway to a certain kind of enlightenment ,or at least, enrichment. I can hold and communicate the knowledge of the COV2 fraud being (having been)committed without its having an origin myth attached.
I am glad you are a fighter, Fritz, but your statement indicates you clearly did not read the beginning of this dialogue (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/dissident-dialogues-meredith-miller-1-4), or you would know Meredith suffered years of brutal physical, sexual, emotional, and psychological abuse beginning in her childhood. The emotional and psychological abuse lasted nearly four decades before she liberated herself from it. Few people have endured an inkling of what she has, but by integrating the trauma, she was able to triumph over challenges that would have broken most people, driving them to addiction, depression, or suicide. The fact that she overcame such traumatic experiences and now appears “privileged” to you is testament to the strength of her character and the success of her transformation.
Thank you for sharing examples of your own abuse and suffering. I think you may find great value in starting at the beginning of this dialogue as Meredith shares similar psychological abuse by her narcissistic mother, who tried to crush her aspirations and denigrated her efforts to rise above her circumstances. Meredith, too, has experienced homelessness and desperation and hitting rock bottom. We also discuss transcending the victim mentality in Question 8 (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/dissident-dialogues-meredith-miller-8-9). You may find you have more in common than you realize and may be able to glean lessons from the wisdom she extracted from her experiences as you work to integrate your own trauma.
Delightful to see Dictators swinging in the town square - there is still hope yet!
This series is truly a brilliant, multifaceted gem.
thank you 💕
Thank you so much for spending your precious time reading it, Edward, as well as for sharing your meaningful response. I know it requires a major time investment, but I believe those who take the time will glean valuable, potentially life-changing insights.
I don't know that my response has any meaningfulness-but your dialogue certainly does...
It’s meaningful to me :-)
Hi,
why using a nom-de-plume like Edward Bernaysauce ??
For sure you know, that it is this guy who is one of the most influential theorists (or shall I call him terrorist ??) in laying the psychological foundations for the current, entirely indigestible mass-psy-ops-gravy on a world-wide scale !!!
🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
because, to paraphrase Madge:
"we're all soaking in it"
All ??? ...
hmmm 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
that doesn't mean we 'all' believe it will soften our hands (as we do the dishes)...
and besides- 'this is my happening, and it freaks me out...'
MAA you and MM should do a book together. these dialogues are pure gold.
in the summer of 2020 tessa lena said (para) "bullies exist to keep us sharp."
connects to MM's point in the post you linked, "If we want to survive and thrive, we will need to adapt to a dying world—not by allowing the anti-life agenda to unalive us, but rather to use it as motivation to create new purpose."
Aww, thank you, nymusicdaily. As it happens, Meredith and I have been discussing turning this into an e-book. I just have to find time to typeset it! I may also make a print version, but it is always a challenge converting my heavily hyperlinked and media-rich content into print format.
Kintsugi beauty and existential empathy, what powerful concepts! Thank you for this journey into healing from trauma beyond revenge. And I love that it all starts with ending the abuser's power over you. That's so important.
What an enlightening series. Thank you to the both of you.
A powerful post by very powerful women !!!💪💪👍👍🌹🌹❤❤ One for each !!!🤣🤣
Thank you so much for investing your precious time and effort and convey it to a wider readership.
I couldn't agree more MM that the pursuit of vengeance or even of justice should take a back seat to the active pursuit of one's individual transformation. After all, one can not "lend a hand" to others in any kind of activity, including reconciliation, if one's arm is broken and unhealed.
From the beginning of the COV2 debacle (jan 2020)I sought evidence to prove a case against unnamed assailants by following a forensic approach to a crime. I answered the how, when and where questions and then formulated an answer to the of "what" exactly (had happened)was happening to the worldwide order. At that juncture I thought it unnecessary to speculate regarding the identities of the perpetrators ( answering the who question) or what was their motive ( answering the why question). Many people to whom I communicated my evidence backed conclusions and who believed the "pandemic" narrative would retort with "why would ( a then anonymous) "they" do this ( meaning the alarmist culture being imposed)? Unlike my evidence gleaned from publicly accessible sources, I had no way of assigning blame or motive to actual named human beings. Beings within my sources; HHS, CDC, FDA may themselves have been directed by others. There is no way of knowing, so it was both futile and pointless to even ask "who" or "why". The crime could be described, the guilty parties are untouchable. My thesis did not require suspects. Identifying suspects would have lowered my high standards of evidence and could have thereby exploded the case. I would tell the curious who had defensively, rhetorically asked "why" that that information was unimportant as to whether you believe an ongoing crime is being committed. That if you find a dead body with a bullet wound originating in the back of the head then, more likely than not a crime has been committed. At that moment of discovery one does not need a perpetrator to secure the knowledge of a crime having been committed.
Back to the point, knowledge is one pathway to a certain kind of enlightenment ,or at least, enrichment. I can hold and communicate the knowledge of the COV2 fraud being (having been)committed without its having an origin myth attached.
On the other hand, I do resoundingly applaud what the Kansas state attorney general is now doing to call Pfizer to justice. https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/egvboakldpq/2024-06-15-pfizer-complaint-(002).pdf
If you don’t believe that they want us off the planet have a read. http://www.geraldbarney.com/Rockefeller_Brothers_Fund/Unfinished.pdf
I am glad you are a fighter, Fritz, but your statement indicates you clearly did not read the beginning of this dialogue (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/dissident-dialogues-meredith-miller-1-4), or you would know Meredith suffered years of brutal physical, sexual, emotional, and psychological abuse beginning in her childhood. The emotional and psychological abuse lasted nearly four decades before she liberated herself from it. Few people have endured an inkling of what she has, but by integrating the trauma, she was able to triumph over challenges that would have broken most people, driving them to addiction, depression, or suicide. The fact that she overcame such traumatic experiences and now appears “privileged” to you is testament to the strength of her character and the success of her transformation.
🎯
Thank you for sharing examples of your own abuse and suffering. I think you may find great value in starting at the beginning of this dialogue as Meredith shares similar psychological abuse by her narcissistic mother, who tried to crush her aspirations and denigrated her efforts to rise above her circumstances. Meredith, too, has experienced homelessness and desperation and hitting rock bottom. We also discuss transcending the victim mentality in Question 8 (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/dissident-dialogues-meredith-miller-8-9). You may find you have more in common than you realize and may be able to glean lessons from the wisdom she extracted from her experiences as you work to integrate your own trauma.